Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Ah yes, but the fact that the source code is available benefits both the people looking for holes and those fixing them. With IE, only M$ could offer the fixes. With something open source, yes, its easier to find holes, since you can look right at the code, but also, more people (not the the company/group behind the software) can offer up patches and fixes, since anyone can get their hands on the same code and resources the "core" developers have. On 8/14/07, Kristian Erik Hermansen <kristian.hermansen-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > > All I can say here is that everyone thought Firefox was the way to > better security. But we have learned that all source code has > vulnerabilities. When Linux proliferates, it will become the new > target of criminals. Right now, Linux servers are targeted for their > bandwidth... > -- > Kristian Erik Hermansen > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |