Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 8/20/07, Scott Ehrlich <scott-3s7WtUTddSA at public.gmane.org> wrote: > I may be looking to add a few TB now, and possibly more later. Traditionally SCSI drives have been on the smaller side, and SATA drives are larger... > What are people using these days? What throughput and reliability are you > seeing? What accounts for the cost differences? Serial-Attached-SCSI could be useful here. I'm forwarding your email to my buddy Peter Petrakis who works on high-performance storage drivers in the Linux kernel. He always has a good sense of that stuff at the low-level. Of course, he is a kernel hacker :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |