Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Rich Braun wrote: > ...my hypothesis is that Comcast quietly did an upgrade of their > network that rendered my old cable modem unusable. The messages below appeared on the mythtv-users list today. -Tom -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] OT: Cable Modems... Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:57:51 -0600 From: Henry A Harper III To: Discussion about mythtv <[hidden email]> > i'm actually going to get cable service :D > and in the process i'm switching my Internet provider as well. i have > a cable modem that is ~3 years old; works fine, i have had relatively > few issues with it. is there any point in upgrading to a more recent > cable modem? FYI, I recently had to upgrade from my 6-year-old DOCSIS 1.1 cablemodem to a DOCSIS 2.0 model because my cable company obsoleted DOCSIS 1.1 support, apparently. You might check the specs/supported equipment of your new provider. For me it was an out of pocket expense since I wasn't renting but that's ok because I could have bought a new cablemodem every year for the cost of renting. There was no warning for this obsoletion other than the "you need a new cablemodem" page suddenly appearing on any web access. Thanks, cableone. Other than that, I would expect no real reason to buy a new one. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] OT: Cable Modems... Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:27:42 -0700 From: Joe Votour To: [hidden email] Quoting Andrew Close <[hidden email]>: > i'm actually going to get cable service :D > and in the process i'm switching my Internet provider as well. i have > a cable modem that is ~3 years old; works fine, i have had relatively > few issues with it. is there any point in upgrading to a more recent > cable modem? > <snip> For now, if you can afford the $50, I would purchase a DOCSIS 2.0 cable modem. DOCSIS is a standard (a laughable one, but I digress), and a DOCSIS cable modem should work with 99.99% of cable operators out there (at least in the USA). I'm surprised that DOCSIS 1.1 has been obsoleted in some places, but as those old Cisco UBRs die and get replaced... DOCSIS 2.0 is not likely to be obsoleted soon, as the DOCSIS 3.0 specification, as far as I know, is far from complete. Once it is ratified, and cable operators start using DOCSIS 3.0 headend equipment, then you'll likely have to buy a new cable modem. (One of the main features of DOCSIS 3.0 is channel bonding, which allows the modem to see more than 6MHz of channel spectrum - the hardware in DOCSIS 2.0 modems will not allow for this.) -- Joe -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |