Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Going back to 32 bit from 64 bit



 > I'm quite happy with 64 bit fedora. 

I was very happy with my 64 bit system, but it got in the way of actual use. 

> 
> What firefox plugins are giving you the blues?  I don't use any non-free 
> plugins at the moment but have previously. 

Mainly sound and flash. 

> 
> Can't you just dump that data from your db and load it again in the 64 
> bit postgre? 

Of course, but then I could not build a DB on one system and move it to 
another, also I *had* a database built and I would have had to refresh my 
memory with HOWTOs to build 32 bit programs on a 64 bit system. 

(BIG databases!! the US street map and GPS coordinates) 



> 
> Wine sucks balls anyway, or at least it did last time I tried it. 

I don't use Wine for GUI apps, I only use it to compile Windows programs 
with the Microsoft compiler. 

> 
> - Eric C. 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf 
> Of [hidden email] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:34 AM 
> To: [hidden email] 
> Subject: Going back to 32 bit from 64 bit 
> 
> Sadly, I moved back to 32 bit kubuntu. 
> 
> On 64 bit systems everything works fine as long as it is 64 bit or 
> self-contained 32 bit, but not all firefox plugins are 64 bit as of yet, 
> so you have to run the 32 bit version, but that doesn't work because 
> things like sound are implemented at the 64 bit level and the shared 
> libraries don't load. 
> 
> PostgreSQL compiled on a 64 bit machine will not read a database built 
> using a 32 bit build. 
> 
> Wine does not seem to work at all. 
> 
> Oh well, maybe next year. 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean. 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Discuss mailing list 
> [hidden email] 
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org