Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:31:09PM -0400, Matt Shields wrote: > Google Analytics are not 100% accurate because a lot of people block > their little javascript in their browser. No web stats are 100% accurate. http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/webstats/ <- old, but still relevant Anyway, the stats packages tend to break down into web server log analyzers or javascript-based trackers that you embed in your HTML. I've used Awstats in the past and been reasonably pleased. I suppose it really depends on why you're monitoring your stats and what you hope to get out of it. -ben -- the strength of the arbitrary decision is that it can be absolute. <phillip j. eby> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |