 |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
|
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:31:09PM -0400, Matt Shields wrote:
> Google Analytics are not 100% accurate because a lot of people block
> their little javascript in their browser.
No web stats are 100% accurate.
http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/webstats/ <- old, but still relevant
Anyway, the stats packages tend to break down into web server log analyzers
or javascript-based trackers that you embed in your HTML.
I've used Awstats in the past and been reasonably pleased. I suppose
it really depends on why you're monitoring your stats and what you
hope to get out of it.
-ben
--
the strength of the arbitrary decision is that it can be absolute.
<phillip j. eby>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
