Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I would sum up my experienve as 'use 64-bit on servers and 32-bit on desktops'. My blackberry can't type! On 10/28/07, David Kramer <[hidden email]> wrote: > I installed F7 on the new server. Actually, I installed F8 rc3, which > died horribly when RPM cyclical dependencies, and my attempt to fix > them, broke XWindows and some other functionality. F7 also had some > dependency problems that caused me to uninstall packages, install new > packages, then reinstall the first set. That bit of frustration is a > topic for another post, though. > > I do a lot of java stuff. I've never had much luck with the gcj stuff, > and I always end up installing Sun's java. Ironically, they have a 64 > bit J2SE, but not a 64 bit J2EE. But java is just the latest problem. > > Before I waste more time tracking down problems caused by running > x86_64, I need to decide if it's actually worth it. From what I > understand, the only advantages of 64 bit over 32 bit are access to more > than 4GB RAM (not a problem for me, since I only have 2GB), and memory > mapping large files (not an issue for the same reason). Am I missing > something? > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |