Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Scott Ehrlich wrote: > [I know this is list is *NIX-based, but there is enough Windows-based > knowledge for this kind of question] > > I have been asked to install Windows XP (32-bit) on a brand new 32 GB > RAM system. Since XP can only address up to 4 GB [1], does the rest > of the RAM go to waste, or is it actually used in other ways? It's used. Each process can only address 4G, but you might be running more than one process :-). There's also an API individual processes can use (Advanced Windowing Extensions) that lets them use more than 4G. Nathan > > It also has 2 quad-core processors, if that makes any difference. > > Thanks. > > Scott > > [1] http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.mspx > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |