Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I realized it was flame bait immediately after I hit Send and I apologize. Please, no one add your opinion to this thread! :^) Using the Reply-to-All command seems to be what most people do here and it gets the job done. On 11/26/07, Matthew Gillen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Brendan Kidwell wrote: > > (META: If I understand correctly, I accidentally just sent this reply to > > only Brendan. Sorry about that. The list's messages don't seem to have a > > proper reply-to header.) > > That's a flame-war waiting to happen... Some people, (especially mutt > users), > would actually say that the list is configured correctly, and if you want > to > reply to the list, you should use the "Reply-to-list" option of your mail > client. > > There's been copious discussion about this in the past (since certain > popular > mail clients like Thunderbird have no such option), and I don't really > want to > get into it again, I just wanted to head off another round of it. > > Matt >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |