Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 16:45 -0500, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Mick Timony wrote: > > > > > I presume you've stopped are restarted Firefox since upgrading? > > Correct. Since the mozilla.org-supplied version has proven to work, I've > completely removed the distro-supplied one. > > Scott I know that with Debian they used to backport fixes for Firefox on stable version of the distro but didn't change the verison number. I wonder if Ubuntu is doing the same. What does the following display: apt-cache show firefox Maybe you should open a bug report? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/ > > > > > On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 08:20 -0800, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote: > >> On Dec 8, 2007 4:03 AM, Scott Ehrlich <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> On my Ubuntu Gutsy system with a recent apt-get update/apt-get upgrade: > >> > >> Just an FYI. I have not run the standard 'upgrade' option to APT in > >> about 3 years. I found it only necessary to always use > >> dist-upgrade... > >> $ sudo aptitude update > >> $ sudo aptitude dist-upgrade > > dist-upgrade is supposed to be used to upgrade from one version of a > > distro to a newer version. For inexperienced users dist-upgrade is > > likely to bork (break) their system. Most users should use safe-upgrade > > as it will install any security fixes and leave you with a nice stable > > system. > >> -- > >> Kristian Erik Hermansen > >> "I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious." > > > > > > > > -- > > Mick Timony > > -- > > > > I thought there was something fishy about the butler. Probably a Pisces, > > working for scale. > > -- Firesign Theatre, "The Further Adventures of Nick Danger" > > > > >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |