| Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 16:45 -0500, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Mick Timony wrote:
>
> >
> > I presume you've stopped are restarted Firefox since upgrading?
>
> Correct. Since the mozilla.org-supplied version has proven to work, I've
> completely removed the distro-supplied one.
>
> Scott
I know that with Debian they used to backport fixes for Firefox on
stable version of the distro but didn't change the verison number. I
wonder if Ubuntu is doing the same.
What does the following display:
apt-cache show firefox
Maybe you should open a bug report?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/
>
> >
> > On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 08:20 -0800, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote:
> >> On Dec 8, 2007 4:03 AM, Scott Ehrlich <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> On my Ubuntu Gutsy system with a recent apt-get update/apt-get upgrade:
> >>
> >> Just an FYI. I have not run the standard 'upgrade' option to APT in
> >> about 3 years. I found it only necessary to always use
> >> dist-upgrade...
> >> $ sudo aptitude update
> >> $ sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
> > dist-upgrade is supposed to be used to upgrade from one version of a
> > distro to a newer version. For inexperienced users dist-upgrade is
> > likely to bork (break) their system. Most users should use safe-upgrade
> > as it will install any security fixes and leave you with a nice stable
> > system.
> >> --
> >> Kristian Erik Hermansen
> >> "I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious."
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mick Timony
> > --
> >
> > I thought there was something fishy about the butler. Probably a Pisces,
> > working for scale.
> > -- Firesign Theatre, "The Further Adventures of Nick Danger"
> >
> >
>