Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Dec 15, 2007 9:10 AM, jbk <[hidden email]> wrote: > Yes, but in my original post I noted that that is what I > already do for downloaded media that I keep. And I > discovered that I already have installed the above named > interpreters. I was under the impression that I could not > even do that in F8 any longer. So help me with the logic here. > Redhat and some other distributions will not include in > their base distributions the codecs for interpreting > proprietary formats and now point you to a for pay licensing > entity for these interpreters. But, can you get a license > for libdvdcss, the most commonly used interpreter? Most > personally owned video cameras use proprietary codecs only > available for another OS. Buying a license to view what I > already own does not seem legitimate. > > Jim K-R
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |