Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Dec 15, 2007 10:12 AM, Matthew Gillen <[hidden email]> wrote: > Well, there's the technical problem of "if I don't care about breaking > the law, how would I do it?". That is the only part that Ubuntu makes > easier. AFAIK, Ubuntu has not paid for redistribution licenses for > media codecs. And I don't believe that Canonical would ever pay the fees for such codecs... > Why do you think they don't host libdvdcss? Because there's a technical > problem, like it would take up too much space on their servers? No, > it's because there's a /legal/ problem with redistributing it in most > countries. I think their redistribution of the other codecs is just as > questionable (if it weren't, then Debian and Fedora wouldn't have a > problem distributing them either). I thought this legal issue was obvious, but forgive me for not stating it as such. I will not go off on another diatribe about legal issues regarding codecs and/or libdvdcss. This topic has been going on since 1999 and is nothing new... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen "I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious." -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |