Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Dec 22, 2007 11:38 AM, Cole Tuininga <[hidden email]> wrote: > Actually, that's not entirely true. Using a recursive DNS server that's > on a fast backbone can sometimes noticeably increase the speed of > lookups. Keep in mind that a single recursive query causes a nameserver > to have to go out and hit multiple different servers on the net. If you > have an "ok" connection, each request has to go across that. > That logic applies only to each request that is not already cached in your local DNS. In the special case of browsing the web with firefox, a typical web page might require a dozen separate http fetches, and firefox will do a separate DNS lookup for each. If www.foo.com isn't already in the local DNS cache, then the first time firefox looks it up, it will query a .com nameserver (as .com is likely already cached), after which the authoritative nameservers for foo.com will be cached locally. For the subsequent 11 queries, if they all happen to be www.foo.com, the local DNS responds without having to traverse the cablemodem, whereas queries to the "fast backbone" are delayed by a round trip through the cablemodem. And all further queries of www.foo.com within its TTL (time-to-live) timespan (typically 24 hours) will also be found quickly in the local cache. -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix GnuPG KeyID: 0xD5C7B5D9 / Email: [hidden email] GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |