Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:44:58, John Chambers <[hidden email]> wrote: > I mean, has anyone *ever* written a compiler (or linker) that assigns > locations as a function of the variable's name? Hmmmm again ... I'll > have to find an excuse to do something just like that. The problem > might be successfully justifying it to others. Did I miss something? I don't think that was the point of the code. There are no locations assigned because of the variable name. It takes the address of i, and increments it by one word (size of address allocation based on your arch, 4bytes/32bits or 8bytes/64bits, etc). The address of j doesn't need to be assigned incrementally (ie. the next word). Perhaps even the allocation is done on architectures where stacks/heaps grow in opposite directions, and subtracting the latter address from the former will actually really mess you up! These are just random thoughts though, and I don't have a specific example in mind. Jerry Feldman is an old sage and provided a personal experience that I thought was a perfect example where someone has assumed just that scenario! I still am young and need to acquire a bunch of those "old sage" personal examples. As of right now, I got none :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen "Know something about everything and everything about something." -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |