Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
[hidden email] wrote: > It is beginning to sound like people have a few things to say about the > matter. There are lots of benchmarks out there and no one knows what to > trust, so here's my proposal. > > We have a MySQL team and a PostgreSQL team. The two teams will develop a > single benchmark that will function exactly the same on both systems. > Something with a lot of concurrency and a balance between complex and > simple queries. It's already been done, sort of. On the SPECjAppServer2004 benchmark, a test of J2EE performance, a server running Postgres 8.2 scored 778 JOPS (jAppServer Operations Per Second), and a server running MySQL 5 scored 721 JOPS. But the hardware isn't exactly comparable: the database server for Postgres was an eight-core Sun Fire T2000 with 16 GB of memory, while the database server for MySQL was a four-core Sun Fire X4100 with 8 GB of memory. http://www.spec.org/osg/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/jAppServer2004-20070606-00065.html http://www.spec.org/osg/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q2/jAppServer2004-20070411-00063.html The TPC (Transaction Processing Council) also has a number of benchmarks for various aspects of database performance. I can't find any official *recent* results from them for Postgres or MySQL, but this page has an interesting comparison of the results from various subtests of TCP-D, which measures query optimization: http://www.openlinksw.com/dataspace/vdb/weblog/vdb's%20BLOG%20%5B136%5D/1132 There are lots of different things people use RDBMS's for, so you can't compose one benchmark and say it is *the* measurement for comparison. Here's an interesting essay by a PostgreSQL developer regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each platform: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.83 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |