Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Fred wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 12:13 -0500, [hidden email] wrote: > >> Your post sort of states why I think this would be >> [fun|good|useful|educational] >> >> Everyone has a benchmark and for some reason it never really compares >> apples to apples and oranges to oranges. There is always some aspect of it >> that isn't coherent. >> >> I think a "real life" benchmark that can be (is) run against MySQL and >> PostgreSQL on the same machines, and not just the huge power servers, but >> the conservative median servers that are used in development and small to >> medium companies would be useful for a lot of people. >> >> The problem with TPC is that, last I recall, MySQL did not support enough >> of the SQL standard to implement it. >> >> Lastly there is an amount of real experience that is gained by doing this >> sort of thing on your own. It is one thing to read the results of someone >> else's benchmark, but it is quite another thing to be writing/performing >> the benchmark and seeing the effects on your own and really equating the >> nature of the test and results. Having the chance to tune the queries for >> better results and seeing the effect of different query strategies. >> Professionally, I have not benchmarked MySQL in a few years and I'm going >> to do it for my own edification. It would be cool if more people can get >> involved and make it a broader and more comprehensive test. >> > > I would love to also throw Oracle in the mix as well, for anyone out > there who is an Oracle guru. >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |