Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:58:50PM -0500, Charles C. Bennett, Jr. wrote: > > Now for the other elephant in the room. > > If X11 sucks so bad, why not step up and do X12? Given the number of > available hands we'd have a working core in 6 months and a port of the > entire bundle of toolkit stacks in 18. Largely because of backward compatibility with the 20,000 other programs that expect to talk X11, plus/minus some extensions. (It's probably possible, but it would be more feasible to implement it as an extension for X11, oh, R9, such that everybody who wanted to port their program to use it could and those who wouldn't or couldn't, don't have to.) -dsr- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and subversive content by DHS, and is believed to be traitorous Commie propaganda. http://tao.merseine.nu:81/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |