Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:43 AM, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote: > On 1/29/08, Jarod Wilson <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Idealism vs. convenience is a big trade-off. Fedora sticks to the >> ideal that only completely free software (typically as dictated by US >> courts) is included in the distribution, and even pointing people at >> how to get something like libdvdcss is avoided, due to the fear of >> possible contributory infringement. Unfortunately, we repeatedly get >> our asses handed to us because of it, by other distributions with >> company headquarters well outside the jurisdiction of the US >> courts... ;) > > Jarod, in all fairness, Fedora still uses bits which are restricted. > In fact, the only distro that I know doesn't use them is an official > Canonical distro labeled Gobuntu. Do you somehow disagree with that? > Without some of the bits in Fedora, you would never get Linux > installed an working on some laptops. This is generally a problem > with binary firmware. Are you saying Fedora does not include any of > this firmware :-?
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |