Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 2/12/08, Eric Chadbourne <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi all. I've just started reading the docs and Freenet looks pretty > neat but the data store makes me slightly uncomfortable. Anybody use it > on Linux? Comments? Another similar app I should look at? Thanks for > any tips. > - Eric C > What makes you uncomfortable exactly? Are you worried about the size of the datastore or the bandwidth you consume in your task of pushing data chunks around? You can limit the size of your datastore and the amount of bandwidth, to be sure that you're only contributing what you can afford to. Are you worried about the content stored in your datastore? Freenet is designed to make it cryptographically quite difficult to determine WHAT exactly you have stored on your freenet node. This allows for "plausible deniability". Legally, it can't be argued that you're guilty of storing and forwarding any particular content; you're merely guilty of running a Freenet node. (For the moment, it's still legal to run a Freenet node in the US.) If you don't know what passes through your node and you can't choose to censor it, then you have no liability with regard to that content. Are you worried about the stability of the node software and the safety of your system? Run it under a separate username with the latest version of Sun Java. Your personal files will be safe, and the node itself will be reasonably stable. If you're worried about the philosophical implications of kiddie porn and bomb plans and other intellectual contraband possibly touching your computer without your knowledge, then Freenet is not for you. The designers of the system decided that making censorship completely impossible was more important than stopping kiddie porn. I gave Freenet another go last week after a year or two of waiting around for significant news from the project. I tried out the January 2008 build (version 0.7a2) and I was pleasantly surprised at how the speed and reliability of the network has improved. It keeps inching along towards "ready for prime time" status. The usenet-like "Frost" bulletin boards look cool. Last time I tried to use Frost, I couldn't get it to work at all, either because of network failures or terrible UI or both, but both appear to be much improved now. Brendan Kidwell -- This message has been scanned for viruses and other dangerous content. Be warned, however, that it may still be dirty. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |