Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:28:35 -0500, Nathan Meyers <[hidden email]> wrote: > But did you have a Digi-Comp I 3-bit plastic computer > (http://www.oldcomputermuseum.com/digicomp_1.html)? That was a real gem. I should have kept mine. It was three J-K mechanical flip-flops, with programmable feedback inputs. I made a pseudo-random counter, I think, among others. I also designed and built myself some small perfboard discrete-component logic; had fun with that. If you like that, Konrad Zuse's first machine (iirc) had floating point, decimal->binary input, binary->decimal output, and was totally mechanical. The technology was a stretch for floating point. (A Selectric's keyboard creates binary codes that go to two mechanical D to A converters to position the "golf ball".) Digi-Comp II was a marble machine (I didn't own one); iirc, it was essentially a four-arithmetic-function logic device. I read that some low-cost manufacturing method (thermoformed plastic sheet?) didn't work out well. My first language was assembler on the BMEWS DIP computer at the NORAD COC in Colorado Springs, before the went under the mountain. No CRT, and the console typewriter keyboard (custom Flexowriter) did not feed the machine; you had to punch a tape, then read it in, but keep parity correct; machine had a 19-bit word length*, so four consecutive tape characters were spliced to make a word. I used the maintenance console (lighted pushbutton for every bit in every register; arranged in three rows so you could read quickly in octal). Machine was ready to roll several weeks (iirc) ahead of schedule, so they OK'd midnight hacking; only proviso was that I be bright-eyed and keen-witted next morning. This was 1960. *Probably the only computer with a 19-bit word. I fairly recently saw a photo of a digital device from that era, maybe a navigational system, with 19-bit registers. Machine was fixed point, and 19 bits gave enough precision for the job. Also had borrowed time on the Philco 2000 orbiting-object cataloging/monitoring machine. (That machine had no clock; all logic was completion-recognition variety, asynch.) I learned its assembler, too. Both machines had rather small instruction repertoires; the DIP had a five-bit op code, and no options for any instruction. When I left Colo. Springs in 1962, I was away from computers totally until 1981, when I encountered CP/M, iirc on a Vector Graphic (it was neither, but a nice-sounding name) machine that used hard-sectored 5¼-in floppies, about 550 kB each, not too shabby. Been a computer type to some degree since. Still have the HP Vectra 386/16N, DOS 6.22 (fairly sure); also had Debian (2.1?) on it. It was/is one of very few machines with software to switch among ISO 8859 codepages. It could run Latin-1 (Codepage 819) as well as any up through ISO 8859-10. Of course, Codepage 437 box graphics got totally munged. It's now a monitor riser, with a housing quite strong enough to take the ~85-lb weight of my lovely curb find, a DEC VRC-21WA in very good condition, VGA-to-five-BNC cable included. (Until I learn how to fix it, new incoming e-mail (Opera browser) is unlisted. Re-indexing should do it.) Best regards, -- Nicholas Bodley Waltham, Mass. On the exaltation of ignorance: <http://preview.tinyurl.com/2cdwr5> soon to have six dozen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |