Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I have a virtual server at OpenHosting and I'm thinking of switching to another provider (recommendations welcome--so far, Linode looks best) because it looks like I can get a Debian system elsewhere at a price competitive with OpenHosting (which only does Fedora/CentOS). But I'm having trouble confirming that other providers' prices *are* competitive, because other providers give package deals for "X disk, Y bandwidth, Z RAM", while OpenHosting uses a "utility pricing" model in which, say, a high-disk low-bandwidth server can cost as much as a low-disk high-bandwidth server. My current virtual server takes up on the order of 3 GB disk (trivial), 1 GB/month bandwidth (less than trivial), and 250-400 MB of RSS. That memory statistic looks like it's pushing against the limit of the cheap plans at other virtual-hosting providers. (VPSLink offers 128 MB of "dedicated RAM" for $15/month; Slicehost offers 256 MB for $20/month; Linode offers 360 MiB for $20/month.) But maybe the RSS on my current server is so high because, well, the physical memory is there and the OS isn't going to swap out anything that doesn't need to be swapped out. How can I tell? The server is being used for my (and my wife's) personal email and our personal Web site, including a blog running on top of MySQL. After I upgrade the server (either by switching to a new provider or by upgrading within OpenHosting from Fedora Core 4 to CentOS 5), I will want to experiment on it with Plone and Zope. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |