Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 06:18:15PM -0500, Brendan Kidwell wrote: > > Editor? Lately I've been playing with Geany. It's fast and has almost > > all of the features I want. Works great on Linux and pretty good on M$. > > http://geany.uvena.de/ > > > Thanks for the recommendation! I'm unfortunately in the market for a new > love affair with an editor. You didn't really say why, and you didn't give any hints as to what about the 2 standards (vi (or vim) and emacs) make them inadequate for you. You may want to elaborate on those topics, to maximize the usefulness of your recommendations. This will hardly come as a surprise to anyone who knows me and my background (I'm essentially a Unix sysadmin who began his career in the early days of Linux), but I'd recommend vim. With a RSS (physical memory footprint) of typically less than 3MB, it's surprisingly both lightweight (by today's standards) and feature-rich, and aside from the weird key mappings that make most people cringe when they're first trying to learn it, I find it's packed full of power in a package that's pretty easy to use (once you learn at least most of the basic key bindings, which are mostly pretty mnemonic). It often comes as a surprise, for example, that vim (and even vi, sort of) can edit multiple files simultaneously, and vim has the ability to split your window into arbitrary numbers of panels to display more than one buffer at a time. It also does a wide variety of auto-formatting and syntax colorization, and has plenty of other advanced editing features. And to be honest, once you take the time to learn a majority of the weird key mappings, you'll probably find that you've grown fond of them... And the best thing is that vim, or some other vi clone, is available by default on virtually every Unix-like system installed today. So knowing it well is nearly universally useful, if you're working in a Unix-ish environment. I learned vim pretty well around 1999 (having used emacs as my personal editor of choice before that) though I knew vi pretty well long before that (vim does much, much more than vi), and today I won't use anything else to edit text of any sort, unless I just can't avoid it. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |