Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Both John and I have full time jobs. We don't have a 24X7 TOC. We generally, don't do that many detailed checks. John has just installed a new server he is testing, and we should be cutting over to that in a while. But, this server is both our mail server as well as the DNS server. I am expecting a new server to be donated to us by my company when they arrive. But, there is really no mechanism in any MTA that I know of that tries to maintain some ordering of the mail queue. On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:30:31 -0500 Ben Eisenbraun <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:57:49PM -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote: > > As Seth mentions "This may be one of those "broken as designed" > > things--there's no guarantee that you'll receive email in the order > > that it's sent". > > Fair enough, but is pretty irritating. :P > > For instance, I have both of Kristian's replies to your message about > Samba and webpages, but I still don't have your initial message. > > Kristian's second reply came in at 11:59 EST. His first reply arrived > at 13:31 EST. From the headers, it looks like he mailed these about 90 > seconds apart. > > > This is a function of the traffic as we have about 30 listservs, and some > > are very verbose. > > Do you have Mailgraph running? It prints out pretty graphs from the > Postfix mail log. > > http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ > > -b > > -- > fortuna favet fortibus > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |