Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Jonathan D. Arnold / Daemon Dancing <[hidden email]> wrote: > But you would assume that a commercial utility would brag about > the differences if there were any, right? The main issue as I see it is regulatory compliance. The man page for the GNU coreutils "shred" command mentions that it's not guaranteed to work on journaled or log-structured filesystems, or on RAID volumes. I had mentioned that to the guy who is negotiating the compliance details with the customer, and the customer responded that the data cannot reside on our normal customer server due to this, so I now need to build a separate server for customer ITAR data. -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix GnuPG KeyID: 0xD5C7B5D9 / Email: [hidden email] GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |