Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I'm not questioning MPEG over USB; that's nothing like full-rate DV. Firewire was designed with real-time video in mind; handling full-rate DV was the design goal. USB2 may have a comparable overall throughput, but I'm skeptical of the implicit claim that it has the real-time functionality to deliver full-rate DV without dropping a lot of frames. Eric Chadbourne wrote: >>> You COULD shove full-rate DV down a USB 2.0 pipe. It's just >>> >> that very >> >>> few camcorders bother to implement it. >>> >> Really? Without dropping so many frames that the video turns to crap? >> >> > > I used to have a JVC digital cam that could stream good quality mpg4 via > USB. To my eyes it looked almost DVD quality. > > What Mark says seems possible but not sure if any hardware actually does > it. > > [quote = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usb#USB_compared_with_FireWire] > Although similar in theoretical maximum transfer rate, in real-world > use, especially for high-bandwidth use such as external hard-drives, > FireWire 400 generally, but not always, has a significantly higher > throughput than USB 2.0 Hi-Speed. > [/quote] > > - Eric C. > >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |