Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 12:51:42 -0400 From: Tom Metro <[hidden email]> Robert Krawitz wrote: > On a 500 GB partition, even if extN only checks once every 30 reboots > or so, it's going to take an awfully long time on those unusual > occasions. I use XFS on my big disks, so I haven't noticed this, but does anyone know why this check isn't performed by a daemon running in the background? Sure, it'd have to be read-only, but if it observed problems, it could record where, and notify the user that they need to reboot for repairs. The repairs should then happen pretty quick, now that the locations have already been found. You wouldn't want to write to the filesystem if it's inconsistent (how do you know what's safe to write to and correct to read from?). It's also a lot harder to validate the consistency of something that's changing behind your back. -- Robert Krawitz <[hidden email]> Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail [hidden email] Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |