Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
David Kramer wrote: > > They have no motivation > to maintain my copper. They hate copper and want to move everyone over > to FiOS. What really needs to happen is a change in regulations. The phone company should be required to resell fiber services, just as they are required to resell copper services. To make the landscape fair, the cable companies should also be required to resell their carriage services. The real reason they want to migrate people to FIOS is that once they do, Verizon pwns you. Right now, they have an incentive to offer poor service to copper customers in order to move them from a regulated service to an unregulated service. If you have no Verizon copper coming to your house, you are cut off from all alternative telephone and internet providers other than cable; a duopoly in most locations rather than a monopoly (a few places around here have RCN available as a second cable company), but still very bad for the consumer. If I were determining the policies, I'd go farther and separate the carriage and content businesses; that is, the company that wires your house would NOT BE ABLE to sell you television or internet services, only provide the conduit for other people to sell you those services. But I don't expect to see Washington to do anything of the sort within my lifetime. And yes, I would also bar television and radio networks from owning broadcast stations. I think the FCC actually had a lot of things right back in the 60s and they have gone astray since. But I know that is a minority opinion, and that there is a LOT of money on the other side. That's why I believe the net neutrality fight is so important. We may have already lost the war in old media, but we have the opportunity not to repeat our historical mistakes on the internet. If ISPs can't provide content, can't have ownership in content companies, and can't make financial deals with content companies, then they have no incentive to prefer one type or provider of content over another, and we will have the opportunity for new content providers to exist and flourish. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |