![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Jerry Feldman wrote: > Unless you really need the connection you may be much better off with a > good wireless. Remember that your connection to the Internet is the > bottleneck, and for most residential services, 802.11G will exceed the > bandwidth of the connection. I'm looking forward a few years to where I'll have extended my file server to be a music/DVR server, and want to shove lots of data around on my internal net. Plus I really like the NFS-home / samba-"My Documents" method of sending things up to my RAID file server without thinking about it. The extra latency and unpredictability of interference that's been characteristic of wireless can suck for that use case (although admittedly I've not had any direct experience with the N variant of 802.11). Right now all my computers are in the same room, but eventually the kids will want their own, and we may need the spare bedroom for something other than my collection. The last couple arguments against wireless are that I like doing home improvements and I get warm fuzzies when I physically plug something in ;-) Matt -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss