Re: "no server" rule

["Matthew Gillen" <user=50@nabble.blu.org>]

 Sorry to resurrect this old thread, but I've been looking into this lately, 
since SuckCast has turned to pissing me off on purpose (they recently 
suspended my account for the crime of running an ssh server and a web 
server, after a week of harassing my mail server with their *inbound* 
port-blocking). 

Tom Metro wrote: 
> Jarod Wilson wrote: 
>> But otherwise, FiOS kicks DSL's ass all over the place. 
>> To boot, I've got 20Mbps down, 5Mbps up (and yes, I saturate both 
>> regularly), 5 static IP and run whatever (legal) services I want w/o 
>> violating my EULA, etc., etc., for only $99/mo. 
> 
> Have you actually studied your EULA and observed language that they 
> pledge not to block ports or prohibit servers? When I looked into FiOS a 
> while back, their sales people couldn't produce a copy of an EULA that 
> demonstrated this. A verbal assurance from the sales person isn't good 
> enough. (If you have an electronic copy of the EULA, it'd be great if 
> you could post it to the BLU wiki.)