Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Matthew Gillen <[hidden email]> wrote: > Probably the most compelling evidence that you did do something that could > be considered trademark infringement is to look at what CentOS has to do in > order to redistribute what is for all intents and purposes redhat enterprise > linux: they have to strip out all the Redhat artwork, all mention of redhat > (including in package names). They can't even mention redhat on their > website (they say "a prominent north American vendor"). Yes, you made some very good points in both your replies. I will semi-aggregate them in this response. CentOS has not removed the /etc/redhat-release file :-) I wonder how many other instances they are allowed to use "redhat"! Also, yes, I made bit-for-bit copies when I posted them. I presume there was some other benefit for me buying the boxed versions, rather than downloading the ISOs. I think the main thing was the phone support serial number for my friend, but I do not recall now. Maybe all the ganja has gone to my head recently ... j/k -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- CISSP, CEPT, CREA, CEH, Linux+, A+, QGCS, ACSA, this is getting ridiculous... http://kristian-hermansen.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |