Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Jerry Feldman wrote: > When we run our application, then save the data on both the NFS server > and one of the NFS client machines in the server room, the save takes > just a second or 2. But, when I save on one of the servers in the > office the save takes nearly a minute. I checked the 2 switches and > they show all relevant connections as being 1GB. So, the differences > between machines are: > 1. NFS client in server room RHEL4U3, connected directly to the switch. > 2. NFS client in office RHEL4U6 connected to a 1GB switch that is > connected via an office patch panel to the switch in the server room. > > Note that when I ping the systems from the server room, I get similar > responses (under .5ms) All the systems are on the same subnet. > > I am not seeing any nfs related messages on any of the client machines. > ... > I've got plenty of memory on those systems in the server room (16GB) > and I'm not showing any swap activity. > > The question is any idea why the 2 RHEL4U6 systems seem to have such > poor NFS performance.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |