Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 11:05 -0400, Mark J. Dulcey wrote: > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > Ubuntu is unusual in other ways too. > > > > http://cycle-gap.blogspot.com/2008/07/linux-kernel-development-stats-from.html > > > > Note the part towards the end where Greg KH mentions Canonical's > > contributions to the kernel. > > I'd have to see whether Canonical is contributing to other open-source > projects before reaching the conclusion that Greg reaches. It's possible > that they are more active in non-kernel projects. Kernel development > isn't the only way to participate in Linux. It's not really surprising > that a distribution where the major focus is UI polish and smoothness > would not be heavily focused on kernel work. > > It's also possible that they send their contributions upstream to Debian > rather than directly to the kernel developers, thus their work is > attributed to Debian developers rather than to Canonical. > > All that said, it's possible that Canonical really isn't being a good > community player. But I think that the jury is still out.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |