Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Suppose that you don't have an investment in AoE equipment; why would one chose AoE over iSCSI? Peter On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Tom Metro <[hidden email]> wrote: > Dan Ritter wrote: >> >> Tom Metro wrote: >>> >>> ...I wasn't aware of Coraid or a third party releasing >>> "server-side" drivers for AoE. >> >> vblade (in aoetools) > > http://aoetools.sourceforge.net/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoetools/ > > >> vblade-kernel (http://lpk.com.price.ru/~lelik/AoE/) >> aoeserver (http://pi.nxs.se/~wowie/aoeserver/) > > Seems that version of aoeserver has been supplanted by: > > http://code.google.com/p/aoeserver/ > AoE target driver for the linux kernel. This is a fork of the > previously dead aoeserver. > > And here: > http://code.google.com/p/aoeserver/source/browse/trunk/aoeserver/README.txt?r=1 > it notes: > > This driver has only a few advantages against vlabde, the userland > implementation of the same protocol: > > * aoeserver has a slightly better performance during normal operation. > * aoeserver has significantly better performance when exporting > several target drives. > * aoeserver supports masking of different hosts. > > On the other hand, there are a few drawbacks as compared to vblade: > * vblade is userland software, making it much easier to maintain and > port to other platforms. > * aoeserver doesn't comply fully with the standard due to the > hostmasking. > > For a reference on another in-kernel implementation of the > AoE-protocol, see vblade-kernel, the main difference between > vblade-kernel and aoeserver is that vblade-kernel uses > only a single kernel-thread and is completely un-buffered on the > server-side. aoeserver uses multiple kernel-threads in order to handle > server-side caching, making it faster, quite a lot faster especially > when exporting small targets. > > > Google Code also lists: > > http://code.google.com/p/ggaoed/ > ggaoed is an AoE (ATA over Ethernet) target implementation for Linux. > It utilizes Linux kernel AIO, memory mapped sockets and other Linux > features to provide the best performance. > > http://code.google.com/p/qaoed/ > Qaoed is a multithreaded ATA over Ethernet storage target that is easy > to use and yet highly configurable. > > > So it seems this is a fertile development space. Thanks for the pointers. > > -Tom > > -- > Tom Metro > Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA > "Enterprise solutions through open source." > Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |