Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:20 PM, John Abreau <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Jarod Wilson <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> I feel obligated to post another link: >> >> http://blog.phunnypharm.org/2008/07/canonical-and-linux-kernel.html >> >> Its a rebuttal by Ben Collins, one of Canonical's kernel guys, who >> admits that while Canonical still hasn't contributed anywhere near as >> much to the kernel as others, its more than 6 patches in 5 years -- more >> like ~90. > > > Interesting. While the comments on that blog don't mention it, it looks > to me like the count doesn't necessarily include everything Canonical > might send upstream; it only counts contributions that were accepted > and incorporated into the kernel. If Canonical submitted 500 patches, > and 499 were rejected, they would only be credited with a single > contribution.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |