Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:17:44 -0400 Kent Borg <[hidden email]> wrote: > Jerry Feldman wrote: > > My preferred choices are Xen and Virtualbox. > > I am liking Virtualbox these days. I used to be a fan of Xen, I was > using it for running Linux guests on a Linux host, but then I was burned > once by their tight coupling between guest and host versions. I > upgraded the host kernel (I think it was) and my guests were all > broken. Maybe my gripe is with paravirtualization more than it is with Xen. > > I have not tried Xen on a CPU with virtual extensions, though I notice > the Xen Wikipedia page says "As of Xen 3.0.2, the list of supported > unmodified guests is limited to certain versions of Windows (incl. XP) > and Linux.". So I fear the "para" negatives are not entirely gone.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |