Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
The subject of partitioning comes up every once in a while. Generally on my systems at home, I create an extended partition in the first primary, and create root, home, and possibly /usr/local. At work, I've been using LVM. For installfests, I generally shrink down the Windows partition and create an extended in one of the remaining primaries. (Windows usually takes up 2 partitions one for Windows, and another for restores). I generally don't bother with a dedicated /boot partition, but thee are some pros and cons. The /boot partition cannot be part of LVM so on LVM installations you need /boot as a separate partition. In any cases there are a number of pros and cons regarding the use of a separate partition for /boot. One of the major reasons for /boot is that the GRUB stage 2 must be within the first 1024 cylinders because of the limitations of the MBR. Currently, as technology moves forward and disks become faster and more dense we are still locked to the old technology: 4 Primary partitions - this is a physical limitation of the partition table. A maximum of 16 logical partitions. I'm not sure if this is a limitation imposed by libata or by Windows. I've never been constrained by this. At this time, I'm just starting another discussion of how people partition their home systems. There are a lot of other factors that affect how systems are going to be used at work and is beyond the scope here. So, here is my preferred partitioning scheme with no Windows(either sda or hda: /dev/sda1 Extended /dev/sda5 Logical / (root) /dev/sda6 Swap /dev/sda7 Logical /home On my 160G HD I also have an additional partition whee I keep downloads, and ISOs. Currently, I don't use a separate /usr/local since I would prefer to rebuild or reinstall the stuff I use in /usr/local. In a typical Windows XP or Vista installation at installfests. Additionally, I either use the Windows resize utility to resize the partition, QTPated or GNU Parted. I do not use the Distribution's partitioning. My procedure is to first reduce the size of the Windows C: partition, then immediately boot into Windows to make sure everything works. This way I have a reasonably good chance that the Linux install does not damage Windows. I then edit /boot/menu.lst to delete the second Windows boot entry pointing to the D: partition. /dev/sda1 Primary NTFS Windows C: Defragged and reduced. /dev/sda2 Primary NTFS Windows D: Normally hidden /dev/sda3 Extended /dev/sda5 Logical / (root) /dev/sda6 Swap /dev/sda7 Logical /home These days I generally use ext3 since SuSE has pretty much forsaken ReiserFS. -- Jerry Feldman <[hidden email]> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |