Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I often need to look up something on my home desktop while I'm out of the house, so I generally leave it running all the time. I access it remotely via an OpenVPN tunnel where the home machine is the client, so wake-on-lan isn't an option. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Palit, Nilanjan <nilanjan.palit-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > Actually, as a matter of routine, I shut off my (Windows) desktop by hitting the power button to my CPU. The reason is that I have the power button mapped to Hibernate. This eliminates any accidental shutoffs (like the one mentioned). More importantly, given how frequently I use my computer and that I don't want to keep my computer running all the time (saving energy and money), it saves me the hassle of doing ALT-CTRL-DEL. I save that for when I really want to shutdown &/or restart my computer. On my Windows laptop I have the power button mapped to Standby since I use it even more frequently and like a quicker startup time. > > -Nilanjan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org [mailto:discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jarod Wilson > Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 9:32 PM > To: discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > Subject: Re: Turning Off the Computer > > On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 21:13 -0400, Bruce Borland wrote: >> The other night I asked my son to turn off the computer. He apparently >> did not want to wait for the computer to shut down normally, so he >> decided to switch off the power to the machine, stopping it immediately. >> I told him that was not good to do, but he asked me why. I did not >> have an answer for him. He did this to our Windows machine, but I >> understand that it is not good to turn off a Linux machine this way >> either. Can someone explain what problems are caused by such an >> immediate shutdown? I would like to know, and would like to tell my >> son, too. Thanks. > > Hard disks are slow, so operating systems tend to cache data into > volatile system memory, before periodically flushing it out to disk -- > only doing one larger batch write vs. lots of small writes all over the > place is a performance win. Pulling the machine in mid-flush means the > on-disk data winds up in an inconsistent state. In some cases, a hard > drive that looses power while in the middle of writing data can even > cause physical damage to the disk platters (rare anymore these days > though). Running services on the machine could be left in a funky state > too, if they were in the midst of some type of transaction (think > database apps here). Undoubtedly more examples out there. > > Not that it shouldn't be possible to make shutdowns *much* faster for > desktop systems... I mean, if you've got a desktop not running any > services, and the user has closed all their docs, syncing in-memory > buffers out to disk and powering off is really pretty safe... > > --jarod > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix GnuPG KeyID: 0xD5C7B5D9 / Email: abreauj-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |