Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I have recently joined a group responsible for a 7X24 environment for about 100 different client environments. We use EXT3 running under Oracle Unbreakable Unix. My question is about insuring filesystem consistency. In my previous lives the filesystems would come unmounted for various maintenance windows often enough to insure that an fsck would be run several times per year. This was good. In this environment there are the dreaded 'Service Level Agreements' and administrative overhead for unscheduled maint windows. We basically don't get to take the environment offline without a compelling and imminent disaster. So my question is: "Does anyone have any methods or strategies for overseeing the consistency of a filesystem (ext3) that is not permitted offline without documented proof of a problem that needs a addressing?" So far the idea that I have is to run and e2fsck -n on them weekly and monitor the results of the first three passes seem pretty believable. The Inode and block counts seem to come out wrong pretty much every time, even on a freshly minted unused 1gb filesystem I made for testing this idea. I even tried syncing the filesystem first, and that didn't even change the #'s the wrong counts found. This might be good enough, it seems like an improvement to me. Comments, questions, suggestions? Allan Morrison
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |