![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:23:36AM -0500, markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org wrote: > I currently support Mac, Linux, and Windows. I'm pretty sure that *any* > variant of unix could be supported, but there are a lot, netbsd, openbsd, > freebsd, etc. > > Does anyone have a good argument about which to support if I can only > support one? After watching a few answers go by, I'll give you advice from the business point of view: Find out which OS your customers are using and support that one. I think what this means in practical terms is that unless you have a highly technical userbase, the unices other than Linux are not going to be worth the time investment.* You'll probably see better returns making the service friendlier to Windows/Mac users. -ben * Linux may not be worth it either. -- you must do the thing you think you cannot do. <eleanor roosevelt>