Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 06:55:00PM -0500, Stephen Adler wrote: > Guys, > > Now that I'm a compiz fanatic... :) I'm thinking of upgrading my video > card. Is there any reason I should stick with NVidia? or are the ATI > cards just as good or better? The rundown: - Intel has the best open drivers, but you can't get their hardware unless you buy it on a motherboard, and 3D and video decoding performance is there but relatively weak. Good choice for general desktops, though. - Via/S3 have mediocre drivers, poor performance, and a couple of aftermarket video cards. Mostly people use this when they don't have a choice. - ATI has proprietary drivers, open drivers, and has opened enough info that the open drivers should eventually be great. That's not yet the case. The open drivers are currently good enough for general desktop use. The proprietary drivers support good 3D but not usable video acceleration. - NVidia has proprietary drivers, open drivers, and has not opened much information. On the other hand, the open drivers are getting better quickly, and the proprietary drivers have good 3D and a newly released video acceleration API which is better than anything else available. -dsr- -- http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. You can't defend freedom by getting rid of it.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |