Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, James Kramer <kramerjm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ben Eisenbraun <bene-Gk2boCrsRs1AfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > I got curious about this whole thing and ended up reading the > > thread, and then the linked how to article, and then Amazon EC2 docs... > > so now I have an opinion, and you get to read it! Yay! </sarcasm> > >... > > > Maybe I'm not fully grokking the set up, but the passphraseless bit > > wouldn't concern me. > >.... > > No, it doesn't. You are basically connecting to a "new" sshd on every > > single backup run; the value of host key checking is negated by that > fact, > > not the fact that you have decided to ignore the useless keys. > > > It is good to know that the system that I am using is fairly secure > because it is working really well using EC2 compared to using s3sync > and s3fs to backup to S3. The back up using EC2 ran flawlessly. I > can make timed snapshots of my EC2 volume to S3 whenever I want. When > I used s3sync and s3fs schemes with S3, I was constantly having > problems with broken links and data was not synced properly. In my > opinion, the EC2 method is the best way to go. EC2 cost $0.10 per > hour to run so it is expensive if you keep it running continuously but > very inexpensive if you boot it up, backup your data, and then > shutdown. What I like most about using EC2 is that I understand how > it works. I never understood how S3 works and so I needed to rely on > the s3sync and s3fs to work properly. Once I clean up my script and > assure that it is working without incident, I will work on all the > suggestions posted to this tread. Thanks for the advice > > Jay > > PS. I have yet to implement it into cron > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > I'm wondering if someone could put some real world numbers to what it's costing them to use EC2 for backups. Maybe I did it wrong, but for about 10GB of storage it was going to cost me around $100/month, but maybe I did the calculation wrong. -matt http://www.sysadminvalley.com http://www.beantownhost.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mattboston Bill Cosby - "A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice."
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |