Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 13:11 -0600, Jack Coats wrote: > Other raid levels are redundant, raid5 has the parity drive > distributed across the various > drives (that is why it requires a minimum of 3 drives, and more drives > reduces 'loss' of storage space). > Raid 6 is really raid6 with a hot spare as I understand it. (and > depending on the controller/vendor you can have multiple hot spares). I think you meant "raid 6 is really raid 5 with a hot spare", but that's also incorrect. RAID6 is very similar to RAID5, but the additional disk is NOT a hot spare, its so the array can write an additional parity bit for every data stripe. You need at least 4 disks, and get the capacity of only (n - 2), but in theory, the array can survive the failure of any 2 disks in the array. -- Jarod Wilson jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |