Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Launchpad to be free

I can understand not wanting to put more $$ into a 'dead end' product
unless there
was something that can be gained over the expenses.  In my opinion, doing an
'as is' license for two generations back of product (would that be
'95, ME, or 2000
at this point?) with 'open licensing' could be of some advantage to
MS, but that is
my opinion, and theirs is the only one that really counts.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:58 PM, James Kramer <kramerjm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at> wrote:
> I have read that the reason that Microsoft doesn't go opensource is
> because of the poor coding.
> Jay
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at

BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!

Boston Linux & Unix /