Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Dan Ritter wrote: > Kevin D. Clark wrote: >> 3: does RT allow somebody to define milestones and to search/report >> based on these? > > No, this is a ticket system more than a bug tracker. The > emphasis is on interaction with customers on one end and > engineers on the other end, without annoying either side too > much, and possibly putting a layer of semi-technical support > people in between. This is an important distinction. RT is a workable compromise between a developer-oriented tool, and a customer-oriented tool, but it is lacking in both areas. There are newer "web 2.0" issue trackers that provide a friendlier interface for non-technical end-users. And developers will find RT lacking, unless you have rather light needs in a bug tracker. Some of the deficiencies can be made up for through customizing RT. For example, addressing the question above, adding a custom field to track milestones is something I've seen done. Although lots of developers must find a fairly light feature set adequate, as a popular tool, Trac, is not much better in terms of developer features. I've yet to see anything better than Bugzilla when it comes to developer-oriented capabilities. Out of the box it supports all the states of a well controlled workflow, fields for projects, components, versions, and milestones, provides separate fields for QA roles, and features for managing patches and code reviews. > Has anyone got Jesse Vincent to do a talk on RT? He gave a talk to Boston Perl Mongers a couple of years ago on his Jifty application framework: http://search.cpan.org/~sartak/Jifty-0.80408/lib/Jifty.pm -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |