Ethernet over unused twisted pair?

[gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)]

Scott,
I personally think that the wireless solution might be the best. You can =

get a pretty good bandwidth from some of the wireless units. The Linksys =

WRT54GL is on the low end of the spectrum, but some of their higher end=20
models, like the SRX will give you both a higher bandwidth and more=20
reliable connection. If you use encryption and authenticate by MAC=20
address, you should be reasonably secure. I personally prefer Linksys=20
and Netgear products since I have had relatively few problems with them.

Essentially the BNC (coax thin wire ethernet) was 2 wire.  I'm not sure=20
you will be able to get much more than 10Mbps over za twisted pair=20
solution where wireless can give you speeds well above that.

On 03/07/2009 08:47 PM, Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
> I'm trying to find a way to get an Ethernet connection from a second fl=
oor=20
> room diagonally across the house to the first floor.    There is no ple=
num=20
> - no dropped ceiling, and having an electrician do the wiring is too=20
> expensive.
>
> I _could_ go wireless, but I'd much rather pursue a hardwired option=20
> first.
>
> So, it occurred to me that DSL is Ethernet than works over a pair of ph=
one=20
> wire.   Is there any device that could convert the Ethernet signal from=
 my=20
> Linksys box to something I could plug into a phone jack that is wired w=
ith=20
> the unused phone pair, then run a mating device in first floor's=20
> corresponding phone jack and get my hardwired network run that way?
>
> Could using two DSL boxes on the wire do the job?
>
> Other than an electrician and wireless, what are my options (other than=
=20
> do it yourself or don't do it at all)?
>  =20


--=20
Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB  CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846