Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Jim Whitehurst, Red Hat CEO questions the relevance of the Linux desktop = in an article on InfoWorld http://www.infoworld.com/article/09/03/25/Red-Hat-CEO-questions-desktops-= relevance-in-Linux-debate_1.html "Red Hat CEO questions desktop's relevance in Linux debate" "New paradigms, such as cloud computing, are changing the desktop scene, = CEO Jim Whitehurst argues" --- IMHO:From the point of view of a corporate desktop, the trend today is=20 toward cloud computing. Things tend to be cyclical, but there is a real = need for desktop (in this context desktop, laptop, and even PDA)=20 computing. When PCs first started to hit the market back in 1978 (I'm=20 talking generically, such as Apple II) or even prior to that with things = like the PDP 8, there became a battle between the IT people for control=20 and many good arguments in favor of IT control, but also many good=20 arguments at the department level for the need to move computing out to=20 the department. Spreadsheets were one of the first programs to be used=20 in corporate space. The argument in the corporation is 1. Who owns the=20 data, and 2. Who is the custodian of the data. IT departments are very=20 good at backing up and securing data, but they are generally poor at=20 reacting to the needs of the individual departments. The individual=20 departments were good at meeting their own needs, but very poor at both=20 securing and backing up their data. back in the 80s and 90s we had=20 generally slow networks, and many departments would meet their own=20 needs. But, today with very fast networks, not only data, but also=20 applications can be centralized and easily accessed (I'm generalizing=20 here a bit). I recall back in the 90s when Unix vendors decided to halt workstation=20 production. Basically, my point is that while desktop systems don't=20 make money, it tends to be the desktop systems that people tend to learn = with. I would also agree that in the corporate world, even if a data=20 center is all RHEL (or SLES), the desktops are primarily Windows.=20 Actually, this is a good thing for IT people because they spend a lot of = time fixing broken Windows systems :-) In any case, I'd like to see some discussions on Whitehurst's statements = from the perspectives of BLU members. --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |