![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:13 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > Jerry Feldman wrote: >> On 04/15/2009 08:01 AM, Stephen Goldman wrote: >>> Hello Blu, >>> Looking for some discussion points on whether exporting LVM >>> volumes as NFS mount points is recommended or not . >>> I am interested in hearing experiences of others. OS is RHEL 5.3 >>> >> Our whole system at work is LVM and NFS (using automount). I don't >> think >> we could operate without using LVM. When we upgraded to RHEL 5.2, we >> reorganized to set up the system physical drive as a single Physical >> volume, and the remainder of the drives as another physical volume >> with >> a number of logical volumes. FWIW, I think that LVM provides a >> tremendous amount of flexibility with little risk. > > Getting off the topic of LVM+NFS a bit here, but I've heard that a > setup > like that (i.e., a logical volume that spans multiple physical drives) > can actually get you into trouble. I can't recall the exact > specifics, > but the gist was that if one of the physical drives dies or gets > corrupted, LVM can get pretty hosed trying to serve up the data on the > LV. Old wives' tale? Nope, that's true. Its often possible to recover all the data contained solely on the drives that haven't failed, but its not entirely straight-forward. Its sort of like JBOD, only slightly more perilous, as the other drives *do* care if a member of the group disappears -- especially if its data that spans more than one drive. Personally, I'd only do multi-drive LVM atop a RAIDx for x > 0, unless I didn't care about the potential to lose all my data. However, note that at least in 32-bit kernel land, if you do software raid + lvm + a stack-greedy file system and/or disk driver, you have a decent chance at stack overflows. Not as bad as was once the case, and pretty much a non-issue on 64-bit kernels, but still a chance. -- Jarod Wilson jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |