Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 04/22/2009 09:39 AM, Doug wrote: >> I always thought of Oracle as one of those super expensive products to= >> avoid (I heard they had an attractive sale force, the sign of a high >> margin product). They always could market services for Berkeley DB >> and MySQL. Now with the patina of ownership, perhaps they can make a >> stronger pitch. I guess what prevents Oracle from doing anything >> draconian financially is that because they are open source, they can >> be forked. >> >> Now I am a bigger fan of postgresql, an ACID DB from the start. >> >> >> =20 Actually, my concern is not so much for MySQL because MySQL already has=20 an OpenSource fork, but for the other products. How will Oracle handle=20 the Java, StarOffice, and VirtualBox (Sun xVM) products. Additionally,=20 how will Oracle handle the support of OpenOffice.org. I certainly think that Java and Solaris will benefit because they are=20 important to Oracle's business, but I don't see where StarOffice (and=20 OpenOffice) fit in. --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |