![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:02:23AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: >>> Also, the libvirt management tools from Red Hat are pretty good. >> >> And from what I've seen, most distros' Xen management tools are all >> libvirt/virt-manager based, and that's the exact same tools you use >> for kvm. At least in my Red Hat and Fedora world, that's the case... > > Yeah, that's why I said "from Red Hat" rather than "on Red Hat". > Debian and Ubuntu package them. Sorry, wasn't clear... The primary point I was trying to get across was that the tools used for both xen and kvm management are one in the same. I know pretty much everyone ships the libvirt/virt-manager stuff for kvm management, but I don't know what they all used for xen going way back. Red Hat's xen stuff has always been handled by libvirt/virt- manager. It was a design goal from the outset to make libvirt and friends hypervisor-agnostic so people weren't tied to a particular hypervisor. -- Jarod Wilson jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |