Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
KVM is built into the kernel, so if you get an update, you don't have to go to a vendor for an update. My experience is with the desktop, and I had Windows XP, Windows Vista Ultimate, and Windows 7 running simultaneous under KVM on Fedora 10. I also have Fedora 10 and Windows XP running as guest OS's under Virtualbox on my laptop. My experience is desktop, not server. There are some limitations, but you can do stuff with a VM you can't do with real iron. (Years ago while converting Burroughs to IBM we had 4 physical tape drives, and I had confirgured 16 virtual under VM/370. We had one job that under Burroughs only used 4 tapes at any one time, but would dynamically open several during the run. With IBM (OS/VS1 you had to allocate all the drives during the beginning of the job in JCL. So, what we did was simply use virtual tape drives and assign and deassign them as necessary). Basically, you should be able to accomplish wat you want under KVM. However, there are some features that are not available from the GUI, but are from the command line - QEMU. BTW: Remember to enable the virtual flags on your processor. On 06/25/2009 12:51 AM, Mick T wrote: > I'm in the process of replacing a few older servers, and I think this > would be a good opportunity to take advantage of virtualization to save= > on hardware and related costs. Both Red Hat and Ubuntu are moving to > using KVM for their virtualization choice. I'm leaning towards using > Ubuntu with KVM as a host for both Linux and Windows 2003 server guests= =2E > My google-fu hasn't turned much information about the performance of > guests, nor many hints of large scale implementations. > > Has anyone used KVM with both Linux and Windows guests and would like t= o > share their experiences or advise?=20 > > I'm interested in how stable KVM is, and how well guest OS's perform > under KVM. And if anyone has done any (or come across any) performance > comparisons between KVM and VMWare and any other virtualization > technologies?=20 > > Plus, how easy is it to use? I want to make sure that less-experienced > folk will be able to manage whatever I build with minimal intervention > from me. > > =20 --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |