![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Christopher Schmidt wrote: > Tom Metro wrote: >> This pretty much explains why cable companies have no pressure on them >> to supply clear QAM. If they're regularly succeeding in getting 95% of >> their subscribers to make the switch to digital service >> voluntarily... then the vast majority of customers have learned to >> accept the limitations and are putting up with them without complaints. > > Because most customers don't *see* any limitations, most likely? I > wasn't aware of a switch being made until after it was made. ... > MythTV users suffer, as do users of DVRs...but is there anyone else? > Those classes would seem a pretty small minority to me. I would expect there to be a large class of people who bring home a new digital TV with a built-in QAM tuner and are disappointed to find that the tuner built-in to their new TV is useless and they'll have to attach a cable box. Do the vast majority of cable subscribers subscribe to premium programming where a box has always been a requirement? Something has changed, because there once was a time when "cable ready" on a TV or VCR was an actual selling feature that seemed to matter. From what I've heard, CableCard, the supposed remedy for this problem, hasn't taken off, so I don't think that explains why there aren't more consumers complaining. The most likely explanation I can think of is that over the last decade cable companies have reset consumer expectations, so no one questions the necessity of a cable box. Once you've gotten past that, then it is just a minority of users that need better control than what a cable box can provide. What do non-cable company DVRs do to address this? Some TiVOs use CableCard, no? Do they also use IR blasters? Getting HD reliably from a cable box is yet another challenge. Supposedly DVR usage is getting up near 20%[1][2], though that's inclusive of the DVRs the cable company supplies. If most are using cable company DVRs, then I guess there won't be many complaints. -Tom 1. http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/01/04/dvr-penetration-to-hit-35-by-2012/ 2. http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/us-dvr-penetration-172-timeshifing-lifts-house-lost-the-office-306/ -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |